Amber Heard used to be grilled via Savannah Guthrie about being “caught in a lie” over her pledge to donate her $7m divorce agreement to charity, within the actor’s first sitdown interview since her bombshell defamation trial with ex-husband Johnny Depp.
The NBC Today host put Ms Heard at the spot over the discrepancies between her pledge and the real bills made, wondering whether or not this raised doubts about her “credibility” a number of the jury.
“Do you think to the jurors sitting there that was you getting caught in a lie?” probed Ms Guthrie, whose husband works for Mr Depp’s criminal staff.
Ms Heard defended the furore over the charitable donation, announcing that the trial used to be used to check out to color her as “a liar” and arguing that she shouldn’t have needed to pledge her whole agreement within the first position for folks to consider her accusations of abuse towards her ex-husband.
When the couple’s $7m divorce agreement used to be reached again in August 2016, Ms Heard had stated she would cut up all of the payout similarly between the ACLU and the Children’s Hospital of Los Angeles.
During the six-week trial, the Aquaman actress got here below intense scrutiny over the pledge after it emerged that the ACLU had to this point won not up to part of the $3.5m cost it used to be promised.
“You had promised to donate $7m of your divorce settlement to charity,” stated Ms Guthrie.
“It was revealed at trial that you haven’t done so yet however they played a tape where you state on air that you have donated it.”
She requested: “Do you think that raised questions as to your credibility with the jury?”
During the trial, jurors had been proven a clip from Ms Heard’s look on Danish TV display RTL Late Night in October 2018, the place she stated that “$7m was donated in total”.
“I split the amount between the ACLU and CHLA. ACLU is a prominent non-profit organisation in the US and they work on the behalf of marginalised communities on the ground, and in legislative reform,” she stated at the display.
“I wanted nothing.”
During Wednesday’s interview, Ms Heard doubled down on her defence at trial that the plan had at all times been for the donations to be paid out over the years.
“I made a pledge and that pledge is made over time by its nature,” she stated.
At this level, Ms Guthrie interjected that to make use of the time period “donated” folks be expecting the cash to had been paid out.
“You say donated you know that everybody thinks you’d donated – not that you’ve pledged it,” probed the TV host, wondering whether or not she feels she “got caught in a lie”.
Ms Heard driven again that “so much of the trial” used to be used to check out to “cast aspersions” on her credibility.
“I don’t know because so much, I feel like so much of the trial was meant to cast aspersions on who I am as a person, on my credibility, to call me a liar in every way you can,” she stated.
Ms Guthrie fired again: “That was the trial, it was a credibility contest – that was it.”
Ms Heard answered: “This is another one of those examples if you pull back and you think about it I shouldn’t have had to have donated it in an attempt to be believed.
“I shouldn’t have had to earmark the entirety of it in order to –”
The NBC host interrupted her feedback as soon as once more, telling her “you shouldn’t have but once you said you did”.
Ms Heard spoke back: “Right and that was where it was intended to go.”
At the defamation trial, jurors heard testimony from ACLU Chief Operating Officer and General Counsel Terence Dougherty that the charity had to this point won not up to part of the $3.5m promised.
Mr Dougherty stated that $350,000 were paid at once via Ms Heard, $100,000 paid via Mr Depp, $500,000 paid via Elon Musk via a donor-advised fund, and that $350,000 used to be additionally paid by the use of a donor-advised fund (which may be believed to be from Mr Musk) – for a complete donation of $1.3m.
The court docket used to be proven a 2016 e mail which detailed a 10-year plan for Ms Heard to make the donation.
The ACLU govt testified that the charity had now not won any cash from Ms Heard since 2019 for the reason that actor “was having financial difficulties”.
Ms Heard used to be accused of “lying” in regards to the donations below an intense cross-examination from Mr Depp’s criminal staff.
At one level, she instructed the court docket that she were not able to finish the bills as a result of criminal prices bobbing up from her ex-husband’s lawsuit.
She additionally claimed that she makes use of the phrases “pledged” and “donated” interchangeably.
Ms Heard’s grilling from Ms Guthrie over the subject comes days after the NBC host admitted that her husband labored as a expert for Mr Depp’s criminal staff.
Ms Guthrie is married to Michael Feldman, a public members of the family marketing consultant and one-time Democratic political adviser who labored on Al Gore’s 2000 presidential marketing campaign.
She made the disclosure in regards to the connection closing week when she interviewed Mr Depp’s legal professionals Camille Vasquez and Benjamin Chew on Wednesday morning’s NBC Today display.
“A quick disclosure, my husband has done consulting work for the Depp legal team, but not in connection with this interview,” she stated.
Ms Guthrie additionally up to now interviewed Ms Heard’s legal professional Elaine Bredehoft at the Today display the morning after the decision used to be introduced.
Ms Heard’s sitdown with Ms Guthrie marks the primary time the actor has given an interview since she misplaced the defamation case along with her ex-husband and used to be ordered to pay him $8.35m in damages.
Mr Depp sued his ex-wife for defamation over a 2018 op-ed for The Washington Post the place she described herself as a sufferer of home abuse and spoke of feeling “the full force of our culture’s wrath for women who speak out”.
Following an explosive six-week trial, a jury of 7 made up our minds that Ms Heard had defamed him on all 3 counts.
Amber Heard is observed at the witness stand throughout intense cross-examination within the trial
Jurors awarded Mr Depp $10m in compensatory damages and $5m in punitive damages, earlier than Fairfax County Circuit Judge Penney Azcarate lowered the latter to the state’s criminal restrict of $350,000.
Ms Heard gained one among her 3 counterclaims towards her ex-husband, with the jury discovering that Mr Depp – by the use of his attorney Adam Waldman – defamed her via branding her abuse allegations “fake” and a “sexual violence hoax”.
She used to be awarded $2m in compensatory damages however $0 in punitive damages, leaving the Aquaman actor $8.35m out of pocket.
Ms Heard described the decision as “a setback” for girls who discuss up with allegations of abuse and has stated she plans to attraction.