Key details about adopting mom now not shared prior to child’s homicide, document reveals | Cumbria

Information about consuming, money owed and psychological well being that will have averted a child boy being positioned with an adopting mom who went directly to homicide him was once now not shared between businesses, an investigation has concluded.

It additionally discovered that once the mummy instructed social employees she was once suffering to bond with the kid, now not sufficient fortify for the circle of relatives was once installed position.

Leiland-James Corkill was once taken into care at start and, on the age of 7 months, was once positioned with Laura and Scott Castle, a pair from Barrow-in-Furness.

Five months later, now not lengthy after his first birthday, the child died on account of catastrophic head accidents.

Laura Castle was once discovered responsible of homicide in May and was once jailed for lifestyles with a minimal time period of 18 years.

Laura Castle. Photograph: Cumbria police/PA

Precise main points of what took place might by no means be identified. But a tribulation at Preston crown court docket heard that Castle misplaced her mood with the child when he would now not forestall crying after breakfast, and violently shook him to loss of life.

In a letter to the trial pass judgement on the child’s start mom, Laura Corkill, stated: “He was placed in the home of a monster.”

Corkill, of Whitehaven, stated her son could be alive nowadays if she were allowed to stay him and he or she criticised the movements of Cumbria county council.

Speaking to the BBC, she stated: “Why did they place him there? Why did it take them so long to pick up on it? They should have cancelled the adoption order.”

Laura Corkill pictured with Leiland-James on a visit at a contact centre.
Laura Corkill pictured with Leiland-James on a consult with at a touch centre. Photograph: Laura Corkill

The unbiased document at the boy’s loss of life, printed on Thursday, concluded there was once related knowledge that will have been shared extra totally between businesses.

For instance, on the time of the adoption evaluate, Castle instructed a remedy carrier that she was once consuming six bottles of wine per week and had problems with low temper, nervousness and anger control. She mentioned shouting an excessive amount of at her organic daughter.

Concern about her consuming was once additionally raised by way of a specialist gastroenterologist and the ideas was once shared along with her GP.

The document says Castle instructed a social employee she was once suffering and was once nervous she didn’t love the child as she had anticipated to. There will have to, the document says, had been “a more timely and robust response” to these considerations.

Lesley Walker, an unbiased scrutineer with Cumbria Safeguarding Children Partnership, stated social employees had to search out knowledge and now not depend on what they had been instructed. They will have to be “really curious and prepared to challenge in all areas of day-to-day working with children and families”.

John Readman, the manager director for folks at Cumbria county council, stated the authority was once deeply sorry and introduced its condolences.

He stated the Castles went thru an eight-month evaluate procedure and no considerations had been raised by way of any individual in any company about their suitability.

“What we know now, from the trial and this review, is that Laura Castle deliberately and repeatedly misled and lied to social workers about vitally important aspects of her life, including her mental and physical health, her alcohol use and debts,” Readman stated.

“We also know now that relevant information about Laura Castle was not shared between agencies, and that more could have been done to clarify some of the information we were provided with.

“Had the full picture of Laura Castle’s life been known, then the assessment of her suitability as an adopter would have been better able to consider the vulnerabilities and potential risks of approval.”

Readman stated he permitted that Castle did inform social employees she was once suffering to bond with the child.

“The report highlights that more should have been put in place to support the family,” he stated. “We acknowledge this and have since made changes to how we work.” He added: “I am absolutely committed to ensuring we do all we possibly can to prevent something like this happening again, here or anywhere else.”

Sarah O’Brien, Lancashire and South Cumbria’s leader nursing officer, stated the cases of Leiland-James’s loss of life would stick with them for a very long time.

“Ensuring professionals are openly and proactively sharing information throughout the adoption process is vital, and it saddens and disappoints us that the review has highlighted a number of gaps where this needs to be improved,” O’Brien stated.

“Lack of robust information sharing continues to feature in child death reviews nationally and for Leiland-James, information sharing was not good enough throughout the critical stages of the adoptive process. Steps have already been taken locally to address this and a recommendation to change national guidance has also been made.”

Leave a Comment