Rebekah Vardy loses libel case in opposition to Coleen Rooney in Wagatha Christie court docket struggle

Rebekah Vardy has misplaced her multi-million pound libel case in opposition to Coleen Rooney after the High Court dominated that she was once in the back of a sequence of reports that had been leaked to the tabloid media.

Ms Vardy, 40, sued Ms Rooney, 36, for defamation after Ms Rooney publicly accused her of being the supply of reports that had been leaked to The Sun newspaper.

In October 2019, the spouse of former England big name Wayne Rooney printed a submit on her social media accounts announcing she had performed a months-long “sting operation” and accused Ms Vardy of leaking “false stories” about her non-public lifestyles to the click.

Ms Vardy, who’s married to Leicester striker Jamie Vardy, denied leaking tales to the media and sued her fellow footballer’s spouse for libel, whilst Ms Rooney defended the declare at the foundation her submit was once “substantially true”.

In a much-anticipated ruling on Friday, Ms Justice Steyn discovered that even though Ms Vardy was once now not the direct supply of the leak, proof confirmed she “knew of, condoned and actively engaged” in knowledge being handed directly to The Sun.

In her ruling, Ms Justice Steyn mentioned it was once “likely” Ms Vardy’s agent on the time, Caroline Watt, “undertook the direct act” of passing the ideas to the tabloid.

But she added: “Nonetheless, the evidence … clearly shows, in my view, that Mrs Vardy knew of and condoned this behaviour, actively engaging in it by directing Ms Watt to the private Instagram account, sending her screenshots of Mrs Rooney’s posts, drawing attention to items of potential interest to the press, and answering additional queries raised by the press via Ms Watt.”

The pass judgement on additionally mentioned there was once “a degree of self-deception” on Ms Vardy’s phase about her position in disclosing knowledge and that she appeared “genuinely offended” by way of Ms Vardy’s accusation.

She mentioned: “Although significant parts of Mrs Vardy’s evidence were not credible, my assessment is that she is genuinely offended by the accusation made against her by Mrs Rooney in the reveal post.

“However, that is not because she was not involved in disclosing information from the private Instagram account: I have found that she was.

Rebekah Vardy sought ‘substantial damages’ from Coleen Rooney

(REUTERS)

“Rather, her indignation at the accusation flows, in my judgment, from a combination of factors.

“Mrs Vardy’’s part in disclosing information to The Sun was, it seems to me, unthinking rather than part of a considered and concerted business practice.

“Consequently, there has been a degree of self-deception on her part regarding the extent to which she was involved, as well as a degree of justified resentment at the exaggerated way in which her role has at times been presented during the litigation.”

Ms Rooney took to Twitter, Facebook and Instagram on 19 October 2019 to factor an astonishing assault on Ms Vardy, accusing her of betraying her self belief.

The commentary, which temporarily went viral, defined how Ms Rooney had turn into involved that tales from her non-public Instagram account had been being handed directly to the click.

She defined how she had determined to set a lure for the leaker and posted a sequence of false tales to look if they might in finding their approach into the media. Acting on her suspicions, she restricted who may see her Instagram tales till just one account remained – Rebekah Vardy’s account.

“I blocked everyone from viewing my Instagram stories except ONE account,” Ms Rooney defined. “Over the past five months I have posted a series of false stories to see if they made their way into The Sun newspaper. And, you know what, they did!”

“I have saved and screenshotted all the original stories which clearly show just one person has viewed them,” she persevered, earlier than dramatically revealing: “It’s……… Rebekah Vardy’s account.”

Coleen Rooney advised her buddies ‘don’t play video games with a woman who can play higher’ after divulge submit

(EPA)

During the trial, Rebekah Vardy authorized that it was once imaginable that her buddy and previous agent, Caroline Watt, could have been the supply of one of the most leaks.

Her attorney, Mr Hugh Tomlinson QC, advised the High Court all over his remaining commentary that Ms Vardy “does not know to this day what happened, she does not know where this information came from.”

“It is possible, as she now accepts, that the source of the leak could well be Caroline Watt,” he mentioned. “Mrs Vardy has obviously made mistakes. One of the mistakes that she made…is that she trusted someone she shouldn’t have trusted.”

Ms Rooney stood by way of her “Wagatha Christie” divulge submit all over the trial, announcing in a written commentary to court docket: “I have always been confident in the truth of what I posted on October 9 2019.”

Additional reporting by way of Press Association

Leave a Comment